Leadership Analysis Based on Shackleton

I. Introduction Sir Ernest atomic number 1 Shackleton, a British explore, was innate(p) in Kilkee, County Kild are, Ireland on February 15th, 1874. His family moved to capital of the United Kingdom when he was 10 years old. At the hop on of 16, he dropped come out of the closet from school to join the Merchant Marines, the youngest age to join the serv crackpot at eon. In 1898, Shackleton became a qualified master and a sub-lieutenant in the olympian Naval Reserve in 1901. Yearning for happen and fame, in 1901 he applied for a post in Robert Falcon Scotts Discoery expedition to the Antarctic.Unfortunately, in 1904, he was sent back home oerdue to his health problem. With the strong desire of adventure and reputation, Shackleton revise his failure by re molding to Antarctica as a drawing card of Nimrod Expedition in 1907. His purposes were to explore the Ross leadge Ice and the south magnetic pole. The tour was a success with his discoin truth of Beard much than(prenomina l) Glacier on the Antarctic plateau on January 09, 1909. On his get alongback, Shackleton received m slightly(prenominal) honors and awards for the happy expedition. Wikipedia) The real journey of Shackleton began on August 1st, 1914 whither he went along with his 27 pack members, leftover London for South Georgia in the purpose to peg the trans-Antarctic expedition the ship was c entirelyed The resolution. On twenty-fourth February, 1915, the selection got stuck in the trumpery park, crushed by the ice and was fin exclusivelyy sunk under(a) the ice in the alike(p)(p) year on twenty- for the first time November. Regardless to the shortage of foods, supplies, no communication equipments, irrefut open the unbear up to(p) cold winter, Shackleton and his bunch never gave up hope.On May 19th 1916, Shackleton and his deuce otherwise work partys Worsley and Crean traverse South Georgia in make up care of the whaling move on the east-coast. They went on root for 36 h ours over the Glacier Mountains and at culture arrived at Stromness whaling station. All the 27 men were amazingly able to return in good spirit after(prenominal) al close to devil years they were stranded in the Antarctic. (Timeline) After humanity War I in 1921, Shackleton returned to the Antarctic and led a nonher expedition with John Quiller Rowett to examine Enderby Land. However, Shackleton died from angina pectoris on January 5, 1922.Followed by the request from his wife, Emily Mary Dorman, Shackleton was bury at Grytviken, South Georgia, leaving 3 children at the time of his death. (Encyclopedia) This report verbalizes various concepts related to Ernest Shackletons attractions flare in the success skill of the expedition including the traits, sorts, the contingency and what it takes to make Shackleton be induce much(prenominal)(prenominal) a owing(p) leader. II. The Concepts * Chapter 1 What does it believes to be a leader? The concept of being a leader has be en carried through times. With a open(a) leader comes great success.As this is wizard of m either theories studied by many aspects, ranging from history, philosophy and the scientific perspective of approach. in that location are several distinctive measures that we fecal matter map to define the complexity of leaders. Often confusing, people instantly who are non extensively furnish with the experience may misunderstand the differences between being a manager and a leader. In the case of Ernest Shackleton and his expertness he demonstrated, we give the gate say that he is a great leader with essential managers skill set that had made him who he is know for forthwith.If we are to look at Ernest Shackletons journey similarly to an organization, with r apieceing the North terminal as the companys main intention, we can try and evaluate his performance base on how removed the goal has been completed. Shackleton was a great leader in such(prenominal) ways that he crea ted a induce image two for himself and his caboodles. This comes from main his fretfulness and jazz for adventure that has thrived his goals both(a) his life. While being such a leader, he is withal a capable manager. A vision alone did not patron Shackleton in reaching his goal.Through being prepared and equipped with great experiences that he devised from his earlier transit, he was able to realistically planned out steps by steps what he expected to attain. Of course, these plans would not come in concert effectively if not for Shackletons leaders skills. Back in the days, leading was defined as heroism, where leaders before being considered as one had to possessed all the knowledge, skill sets and abilities to overcome any obstacles. While being such the case, the way in which Shackleton demonstrated his leadership skill were not unaccompanied received to this theory.While being a genuinely cute role ensample, he also possessed numerous traits, unconstipated those that are relevant to assembly linees leaders we can ascend today. To promptly put it, his successes are all thanks to the spare-time activity traits that he has reflected * Out of all the possible traits he exhi eccentric personed, the virtually important was inarguably the readiness for him to remain optimistic under any component and the self-confidence that he always express. This certainly affect the productivity of his cabal and his success. He was open-minded to opportunities and the passion to go forthingly learn new skills relative to achieving his vision. being able to draw out the big mental image and actually do something about it has helped him reached his desire. * He was extremely motivated. This comes from his unmovable passion for adventure that he innately possessed. * He was observant of his crew members. Being able to keep close attention to the needs and wants of the individuals has helped him to attain the strength and weaknesses that he can workout to his advantage.From these picture take aims of views, all these traits are necessary components of qualification a great leadership, and it has become the keys to many booming leadership stories in the business worlds that exist today. * Chapter 2 Traits, behavior and relativeship As mentioned above in the prior section, Ernest Shackleton had a variety of leadership traits that define his pilot to the North Pole. He was, many considered self-confidence, motivated, optimistic as comfortably as being a leader with a great drive compute to mold his crews/employees. He was considered a great image, a true hero in his own time.However, deal any leaders, he isnt perfect. His success came with the price of lives from his crew members. Although his vision was accepted by many like him, he had made lasts that lead to the disastrous detail that would had plausibly otherwise, created another turn of event. But un precariousnessedly, his leadership had proven its wonder u nder extreme check off. He was passionate and considerate to his crew, that to certain extend, some might say he was a bit of a dare devil to risk his entire ship to bet against the intense condition that are unlikely to be anticipated.The life and time of Ernest Shackleton is perchance one of many well known cases and a great example of the bossy leadership look in conjunction with traits that belong to the democratic class. The fashion that Shackleton adopted was mainly due to several reasons that had proved to be more effective. During the voyage, Shackleton relies upon his personal judgments and close inadvertence to guide the crew members through the harsh penalisation of mother nature.Having closely worked together with the crew mate, in which most of them looked up to Shackleton as a deferent leader with a burning passion that multifariousnessled their owns, the crew members were able to scram a champion of trust and heroism in his figure. Since he and the crew members hold always been together directly under his influence and command, a soul of synchronization, rather than personal identity was needed in order for things to flow fluently passim his trip. This is especially true during those times where his ship, the Endurance got struck and stranded on ice.It was during this time that his autocratic personal manner really shines. Put under the dower of such hardship and craziness, one could possibly go insane from fear, hunger, and desperation. It was crucial that each members of the party followed orders and did not revolt against their own allow. Shackletons leadership modality helped the entire crew to stay affirmative and motivated, and insisted on drawing out the survival factors in each member not to give up their lives so substantially. For Ernest Shackleton, there was a time pressure and a needed for regulation within the root.Not only that his sense of business, able to put his people first when he turned back after a lmost making it to the destination when one of his crew condition became grim was important, his world power to think straight in these lout times had proved Shackleton to become a great example under the explanation of leadership. In relation to the previous point, we can conclude that Shackletons leadership style is another representation of the consideration style since he cared about his mens emotions and synthetic rubber rather than his own success.According to the voyage, his crew enjoyed three bounteous moon meals for the celebration of Leap Year Day and he also organized other fun activities for his crew such as dog racing, despite all the ruthless weather that were almost close to cleanup them e preciseday. When the Endurance got wrecked into the sea, instead of being all hopeless and upset, Shackleton told his crew that they are tone ending home. This infamous quote marked his true spirit and show that he was one of the greatest leader of all. By reassuring the cr ew through focusing on the needs and desire that they currently uphold, he lightened up the hopes for his crew that they can o through this hooligan office staff together, in which they did at the end. From business point of view, Shackleton applied an Employee Centered Style throughout the hearty expedition. He led his crew (employees) in positive ways and cared about his pursual both physically and emotionally. He considered himself as one of the follows, as a part of the company, not just by life history himself a leader and only know how to publish decision or order others to get the work done. This can be summarize through the definition of lead by example leadership style.When the passing game got tough, the needs for harmonization and fusion of each members will is very important for survival. Ernest Shackleton, while trying his trump to individualize his leadership according to each subordinate, was more foc utilize on trying to lead everyone towards the same path . Through the application of heroism, Shackleton was able to guide the crew and motivate them by targeting the respect and mutual tone of voice that the crews already feel toward him. This accentuated the spirits of all the members, consolidative all their needs and centralized it as a whole.The turbulence that his group had to go through could had left a devastating effects, instead, they became stronger and stronger as each obstacles were overcome with joy and hope that Shackelton, with his leadership style represent. frequently had lurchs since Shackleton became a living legend, but the principal and theory, as well as practical principle still remained the same. The business world that we live in today has much to apply. Leaders today need to suit to changes, being able to quickly think on their feet and remain charismatic to the subordinates are the key agent to creating a great leader.As mints are adapting more changes and re coordinate down to a heterachy aim, we se e a more decentralized structure in which employees are back up with power. But the needs for centralized authority remained the same under emergency, and that leads us to the next section of this report. * Chapter 3 Contingency approaches to leadership One may weigh that perhaps Ernest Shackleton and what he had to go through had cause the way that his business style he adopted. In relation to the Fiedlers Contingency Model, we start by examining Shackletons decision in relation to the circumstance that befell him.This model allows us a mode of valuation for both the leadership styles and the organization topographic point, under two criteria, which are task and relationship. Shackleton had demonstrated a waxy style of leadership in numerous cases. He was not afraid to change and adjust his tactical manoeuvre to achieve his goals. This is especially true during the highlight of his voyage sailing on the Endurance. The Antarctica weather was harsh and unforgiving, move a t oll on Ernest to outperform the condition to survive. His goal upon setting sail was to set foot on the icy North Pole, but was afterward changed to endure the coldness and to get out of here alive.Such a drastic change in the state of affairs asked for great demand in Shackleton to judge the situation as the lives of his crews are placed in his hands. A shift from a task-orientated style to a more relationship-orientated style challenged him mentally. As the result, he was able to complete his task of getting his crews out alive. Based on the three key elements of the situation, since he was able to develop such mutually agreement among the group and himself. They actually admire and had confidence in their leaders. Thus, this leads to a unification of the group towards achieving the goal.The task structure that Shackletons crew had to undergo was of immense difficulties. The unpredictable outcome caused the group to have a low task structure to enhance flexibility. Therefore, the responsibility that Shackleton had to shoulder was huge. This lead to the last element of set power. Since the group was striked with an unexpected turn of event, it was up to Shackleton to steer the crew back to following the objective, which he had done magnificently thorugh need and hike as a leader. The Hersey and Blanchards Situational Theory can also be used to explain the leadership style of Ernest Shackleton.Since Shackletons crew were very well equipped mentally due to their leaders constant demand and the method that led them, together with the low task structure, Shackleton need to employed the participating strategy, followed up with the Delegating strategy. At first when the Endurance was out of hope to be recovered, his crews were no doubt feeling desperate about the situation. But with Shackletons igh spirit, they were able to pick up from scratch. In other words, they were able but unwilling when faced with such a disastrous situation. They need guidance and irection as the objective of the voyage had completely changed. Shackleton had done so very effectively in inspiring the will to live, through his famous quote Were going home. As the situation progress, Shackleton was able to slow earn more trust and confidence in his crew, this slowly move the relationship behavior carriage down to the lower end, toward the Delegating strategy area. During his search out for Elephant Island, he had to make a decision to leave the crew behind as to find a way to contact the mainland and signal for help, he delegated Thomas Crean, his second-in-command crew to take charge after he was gone.This could not be done without a high level of trust and high level of abilities to achieve such task. It was remarkably assuring to the ministration of crew that when he announced he would come back for them, which he did. ( Find more instruction about the other 2 thoeries ) The Path-goal theories also raise to analyze the leadership style of Shackleton in a very definite way. According to the definition, Path-goal theory full dependable on the leaders responsibility to lead and motivate in order to achieve organizational goal.The journey that Shackleton had to travel was filled with adversity. At first, he was determined to reach the North Pole as this is the set objective, and he communicated this objective very well to his groups of followers. This in return affected the kind of motivation that the crews expected from the voyage. During that time, the glory and fame of being the first few men to set foot on the Artic ice was indeed very attractive, especially for the gallant souls like Shackleton and his crews who were seeking intrinsic respects as the mean to strive for the objective.Shackleton was a employ man, his passion not only reminded himself of the goal every day, but it was also the fuel that ignited the dedication of his crew members. He kept the rewards clear as they moved along, even when the Endurance crashed. Sh ackleton still managed to quickly adapt to the situation and influence his police squad through the change of reward, which was now to safely escape his hazard. This theory explained how he was able to keep the motivation of his employee high throughout the voyage even when there was a change of goal, especially when the change was so drastic.Ernest Shackletons leadership style is also applicable to the explanation of the vroom Jago Contingency Model. Similarly to some of the models and theories above, this theory specify the participative leadership degree and how it correlates with the results and accountability of the decision. At time when Shackleton first commenced the journey, he gathered groups of attuned people based on character as well as competence. He knew very well the danger and how the strength, both physically and mentally of his crews had to face. The selection process picked out crew members with a positive attitude.This helped Shackletons leadership style to tak e effects in the most successful way. He had also develop a strong sense of loyalty and trust towards his crew members. This significantly proved to be the decisive factor as the Endurance got stranded on ice when it really shined. To an extent during the voyage, his participation was at the allay degree as he understood the ability of each individuals well enough to let them take charge while presenting ideas and experience on sufficient terms. When the Endurance sunk, he became more delegating as the group faced extreme adversity, while retentiveness them motivated.One can interpret and use different model to define Ernest Shackletons leadership style. Based on the diagnostic questions, he was actively involved in the preparation process before they set sailed, exhibit high level of participation and consideration as the expedition was many adventures dream at that time. By sharing the vision, he was able to collect the most suitable group of people. Because the importance of c ommitment was very high, Shackleton would personally interview each member he chose for a mutual agreement on the objective of the journey.Since Shackleton had been on past trips to the North Pole, he used the experience to persuade people and forming a reliable trust conformity. This helped to increase the likelihood of commitment of his followers out of respect for passion and knowledge. Shackleton implied the motivation theories very well as he was able to impel the sailors of the goal that he wanted to achieve, turning it into the goals of the group as a whole. This increase in restrain for the goal helped them to overcome challenges together later on.Last but not least, his team was not only dedicated but high trained for such an expedition. Shackleton was able to trust them and delegate tasks effectively. Based on the style of leadership that Shackleton represent, we can use the Path finishing Theory to best explain his style, as motivation towards the same goal as a team w as the critical factor. His team was put to the test in such a condition that will easily drained the lives out of anyone, but with high motivation and a clear goal that unified them, he successfully pulled through and survive the weather that everbody deemed impossible.Without the corporation of each members, perhaps he could not have made it and that is why this theory is best indicate to explain his leadership style. Chapter 4 The leaders as an individual Throughout his lives on the expeditions, we have seen how great a leader he was through the team members that he motivated, but how about concerning Ernest Shackleton as a leader in his own definition? Chapter 4 1. Big five personality that ES had * extroversion * Conscientiousness * Emotional stability * Agreeableness 2. I would say ES had an internal Locus of Control.He was self-motivated and was likely to influence others. 3. ES was authoritarian. He relied on position power. 4. Shackletons End Values were to lead an fear less life, explore the trans-Antarctic. His Instrumental Values were being trusty to his crew, being honest, being helpful. 5. I think ES was a Theory Y Leader. He set his crew and understood what his followers wanted or needed so that they have the strengths to keep fight throughout the hardship they had. Notes * When he died, Shackleton left debts of ? 0,000, over ? 700,000 in todays terms. That money, however, came from people who could afford it. Works Cited Sir Ernest Henry Shackleton. Encyclopedia of World Biography. 2004. Encyclopedia. com. 2 Jun. 2012 . Shackleton Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 2 June 2012. Web. 02 Jun. 2012. ( I dont think we should use Wikipedia as a reliable source ) Nova Online Shackletons Voyage of Endurance.Feb 2002 Web. 02 Jun 2012. http//personnel. ky. gov/nr/rdonlyres/6c98ae12-6df1-4476-acd3-ff1c9b2770f4/0/someshackletonleadershiplessons. pdf http//leadership. wharton. upenn. edu/l_change/Interviews/Shackleton. pdf http//www. nytimes. com/2011/12/25/business/leadership-lessons-from-the-shackleton-expedition. html? pagewanted=all http//artofmanliness. com/2011/08/02/leadership-lessons-from-ernest-shackleton/